Useful assistance. Clear limits. A considered workflow.

AI development & automation.

An AI feature earns its place by helping with a defined task: finding an answer in approved documents, preparing a draft or moving a routine request through the right steps. I build assistants and integrations around that task, with attention to the information they use, the actions they can take and what should happen when a person needs to step in.

Explore the scope

Where this fits

A good fit for

  • Businesses helping customers or staff find answers in an approved knowledge base or document collection.
  • Product teams adding summarisation, drafting, classification or another useful AI feature to an existing app.
  • Teams exploring automation for a repeatable workflow with clear access rules and human review points.

The work, made concrete

What the scope
can include.

The final deliverables are agreed around your project. These are the main areas we can work through together.

01

A defined AI task and review criteria

An agreed use case, example inputs and a practical description of a useful result. We also identify unacceptable outputs, missing information and the points where the feature should ask for clarification or hand over to a person.

02

Assistants and document search

A chatbot or search experience connected to the material you approve, with supporting sources where useful. Document preparation, access permissions, updates and questions the collection cannot answer are included in the scope.

03

AI API integration in your product

Connections to a suitable AI service for the agreed feature, such as drafting, summarising or organising incoming information. The work covers server-side credentials, input handling, response formats, loading states and understandable error feedback.

04

Automation with clear action limits

Workflows or agents that carry out agreed steps across your systems. We define which records they may read, which actions they may take and where a person must approve a result before information is changed or sent.

05

Evaluation, fallbacks and usage visibility

Checks using realistic examples, including ambiguous questions and unsuitable responses. The implementation can include human handover, request limits and usage reporting, alongside notes on model choices, provider costs and how to review the feature after release.

From brief to handover

A practical path
through the project.

  1. 01

    Choose one useful job

    We describe the current task, the information involved and who will use the feature. Starting with a specific workflow makes it possible to judge whether AI belongs in the solution and what a useful first version should achieve.

  2. 02

    Map information and permissions

    We review the approved documents, existing systems and provider options. Access boundaries, allowed actions, review points and an initial usage model become part of the implementation brief.

  3. 03

    Build and evaluate the flow

    The assistant or integration is implemented and reviewed against representative examples. We examine supporting sources, mistakes, incomplete inputs and tool failures, then refine the behaviour and fallback routes.

  4. 04

    Release with a review plan

    We prepare the agreed deployment, usage controls and handover. The documentation covers configuration, content updates, access and the examples to check again when the feature, provider or source material changes.

Before we start

Useful questions,
clear answers.

The best brief makes the important decisions and dependencies visible early.

What is a useful first AI feature for a business?

A specific, repeatable task is a good starting point: finding an answer in a help collection, drafting a response for review or organising an incoming request. We look at the current process, the available information and how a person will check the result before defining a feature.

Can an assistant answer questions using our own documents?

The scope can connect an assistant to an approved set of documents or help content. We need to decide which users can access which material, how it stays current and how answers show their supporting sources. Missing or conflicting information needs a clear fallback; access to documents alone does not guarantee every answer will be correct.

Can an AI agent make changes in other systems?

An integration can be allowed to carry out specific actions, but that permission should be deliberate. We define the allowed actions, account access, review points and what happens after an error. Actions such as sending a message or changing a customer record can require confirmation before they run.

How do you assess quality and ongoing usage costs?

We agree realistic examples and expected behaviour, then check useful answers, mistakes and handovers against those examples. Running costs depend on the provider, model, request volume and amount of information processed. An initial usage estimate, request limits and a way to review actual consumption can be included; provider fees are separate from development work.

How are our data and API credentials handled?

Before connecting a provider, we agree what information may be shared, the account that owns the integration and the relevant provider settings. Credentials belong in server-side configuration, and document access and automated actions need appropriate permissions. Data that is unsuitable for the selected service can be excluded from the feature’s scope.

Start with a useful conversation

Start with a task worth improving.

Describe the question, document collection or repeated workflow you have in mind. We can identify a useful first feature, the information it needs and the boundaries it should respect.

Let’s make something good

Your next idea
starts here.

A few details are all we need to start a conversation.

You’ll review the brief before it’s sent. I reply within one business day.