Understand the bottleneck. Improve the experience.

Website speed optimization.

A slow website needs a diagnosis, not a collection of settings changed at random. I review representative pages and important interactions, identify where loading or responsiveness is being delayed, and implement the agreed improvements with a clear record of what changed and how it was checked.

Explore the scope

Where this fits

A good fit for

  • Businesses with slow public pages, heavy images or a website that feels unresponsive on mobile.
  • WordPress teams trying to understand the impact of a theme, plugins, embeds or hosting configuration.
  • Web app teams investigating large frontend bundles, rendering work or slow data requests.

The work, made concrete

What the scope
can include.

The final deliverables are agreed around your project. These are the main areas we can work through together.

01

A representative performance baseline

Review of the agreed pages, devices and important interactions, including Core Web Vitals where suitable data is available. Real-user information is considered alongside controlled tests so the work starts from a useful description of the problem.

02

Prioritised findings

A practical list of the main contributors and the proposed changes. Images, fonts, scripts, rendering, third-party tools and server responses are considered according to the evidence from the site.

03

Implementation of the agreed fixes

Changes may include image delivery, resource loading, frontend code, caching or site configuration, depending on the diagnosis and access available. The scope identifies anything that needs a host, vendor or separate backend change.

04

Comparable checks and regression review

Repeat checks using documented conditions, together with review of the forms, navigation and other important behaviour affected by the changes. Results are reported with their context rather than reduced to one unexplained score.

05

A practical maintenance note

A record of the changes and the site decisions that could reintroduce the same issues, such as oversized uploads or additional third-party scripts. Further monitoring or ongoing optimization can be scoped separately.

From brief to handover

A practical path
through the project.

  1. 01

    Choose the important pages

    We identify where users enter the site and which tasks matter most. You share existing reports, the current hosting setup and examples of the behaviour that feels slow.

  2. 02

    Investigate the causes

    I review loading and interaction behaviour, the resources involved and relevant application or hosting configuration. Findings are prioritised before changes are proposed.

  3. 03

    Make focused changes

    The agreed work is implemented with attention to the site’s existing functionality. Changes with wider consequences are separated from straightforward optimizations so they can be reviewed appropriately.

  4. 04

    Compare and explain

    The affected pages are checked again under comparable conditions. You receive the results, the changes made and any remaining limits or follow-up work identified during the review.

Before we start

Useful questions,
clear answers.

The best brief makes the important decisions and dependencies visible early.

Can you guarantee a perfect PageSpeed score?

No. A score depends on the page, test conditions, third-party services and the underlying hosting or application. The useful goal is to identify concrete bottlenecks, make appropriate changes and report comparable evidence. A target can be discussed after reviewing the baseline.

Do you optimize both WordPress and custom web apps?

Yes, the investigation can cover either. The likely work differs: a WordPress site may involve theme, plugin and hosting decisions, while a custom application may need changes to frontend code or data loading. Access to the relevant systems determines what can be implemented.

What is the difference between a test and real-user data?

A controlled test shows how a page behaves under a defined set of conditions. Real-user data reflects visits across actual devices and connections. They answer related but different questions, so I consider both when the necessary information is available.

Will optimization change the design or break features?

Some improvements can preserve the existing presentation; others involve tradeoffs, such as changing an animation or removing an unnecessary embed. Those changes should be discussed. The agreed review includes important behaviour affected by the work, including forms and navigation.

What should I send before a performance review?

Start with the website URL, the pages or interactions causing concern, the technology and hosting you use, and any existing reports. Tell me which third-party tools and visual features are essential so recommendations account for the actual business requirements.

Start with a useful conversation

Find out what is making the site feel slow.

Share the URL, the pages that matter and any reports you already have. We can define a performance review around the actual experience.

Let’s make something good

Your next idea
starts here.

A few details are all we need to start a conversation.

You’ll review the brief before it’s sent. I reply within one business day.